Woods
Whereas Nicklaus was part of “The Big Three” for most of the 1960s, Woods is part of “The Big Four,” though to a list of rivals that includes Vijay Singh, Ernie Els, and Phil Mickelson, one could easily include Retief Goosen and make it “The Big Five.”
But Woods does not enjoy the separation between the layers of talent that Nicklaus had, mainly because there are greater numbers and deeper talent pools in today’s landscape.
When Woods doesn’t win, there is a long list of solid candidates ready to step in; that was not the case during Nicklaus' reign, which is why the majors were dominated by a small group of players.
Nicklaus
Yes, he knocked Arnold Palmer from the throne and had Gary Player, Billy Casper, Johnny Miller, Tom Weiskopf, Lee Trevino, and Tom Watson at their top form, too.
But Nicklaus didn’t have to worry about Europe’s best and Australia’s best and Sweden’s best and Japan’s best week-in, week-out on the PGA Tour.
|
In other words, he had talent to compete with, but it wasn’t as steel-eyed and deep as it is today.
Latest golf video |
Will Tiger win again? The Masters is going to be huge for Tiger Woods, but don't expect him to be the player he once was. |
Slideshow |
Top 10 'accessible' golf courses From California to Florida, these amazing greens are open for anyone to play. more photos |