Video

Mad Dog Minute: Questionable gamble Nov. 17: A lateral play at the end of the Steelers - Chargers game makes Mad Dog think something funny is up with NFL refs and gambling.

/

updated 6:54 p.m. ET Nov. 18, 2008

The Pittsburgh Steelers walked off the field Sunday just happy they had won.

A lot of bettors in this gambling city were more concerned by how many points they ended up winning by.

Winners turned into losers and losers ended up winning when a game that should have ended up 17-10 or 18-10 instead went into the record books as the first 11-10 final in NFL history. Though the score made no difference in the win and loss column, it did in the wallets of a lot of bettors on the Las Vegas Strip.

“Anyone who had a bet on the Pittsburgh side and thought they had won weren’t too happy,” said John Avello, director of the race and sports book at the Wynn resort.

A mistake by the officials on the final play of the game between the Steelers and San Diego Chargers didn’t alter the outcome. But it did mean bettors who thought they had won money on the game actually lost, while those who thought they had lost ended up winning.

The Steelers were favored by 4 points, meaning the apparent touchdown scored by the Steelers’ Troy Polamalu on the last play of the game made the difference between Pittsburgh covering the point spread or not. When the touchdown was disallowed, Pittsburgh bettors who thought they had won on a fluke on the last play were left holding worthless tickets.

The NFL said it is discussing with the rule-making competition committee “potential administrative improvements for replay that would help to prevent this type of mistake in the future.” That might take place before the playoffs, ESPN reported.

That presumably could include allowing officials to take a second look at controversial plays, something not now permitted under the current rules.

“On the final play of Sunday’s game between the Chargers and Steelers, Pittsburgh safety Troy Polamalu returned a loose ball 12 yards for a defensive touchdown,” the league said in a statement Monday. “After an instant replay review and crew conference, the on-field ruling of touchdown was incorrectly reversed to no touchdown due to an illegal forward pass by San Diego.

“The incorrect reversal of the on-field ruling of touchdown was acknowledged immediately following the game by referee Scott Green in the pool report interview with a representative of the media.”

Avello said there might have been $10 million bet on the game statewide, and many times more than that in illegal bets around the country and in offshore Internet betting sites. There was more money bet on Pittsburgh, he said, especially in parlay bets.

Though the officials later said they made a mistake in calling back the touchdown, the official score remains 11-10, and Nevada sports books paid off on the final score from Sunday.

More news

Justin Edmonds / Getty Images

Manning off to strong start

PFT: Broncos coach John Fox raves about Peyton Manning's progress on the first day of OTAs.

'It felt good,' Manning says of workout

ENGLEWOOD, Colo. (AP) - His passes were hitting receivers in stride and right between the numbers, not skipping off the ground or whizzing behind their heads like so many of Tim Tebow's.

Headlines

• Label

Breaking down fantasy football offensive stars

PFT: Saints players believe they're being 'railroaded'

PFT: No progress between Rice, Ravens

PFT: Texans' Johnson will sit out OTAs

PFT: Rivera says Newton will avoid sophomore slump

PFT: Suspended Loomis will work for Hornets

PFT: Osi falls short of target to buy LT's ring

Rotoworld: Ranking the NFL's offensive lines